Antimicrobial Stewardship and Dose Adjustment of Restricted Antimicrobial Drugs in Hospital Setting.

Antimicrobial consumption is increasing. In order to maximize the effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship and provide safe and optimal use of restricted antimicrobial drugs, renal dosing should be evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of restricted antimicrobial drugs that required dose adjustment according to renal function. A retrospective, consecutive study was conducted at University Hospital Dubrava. This study analyzed requests for restricted antimicrobial drugs (n = 2890) during a 3-month period. Requests for antimicrobial agents were evaluated by the antimicrobial therapy management team (A-team). This study included 412 restricted antimicrobial drug requests requiring dose adjustment, of which 39.1% did not have an adjusted dose. Meropenem, Ciprofloxacin, Piperacillin/Tazobactam, Vancomycin, Colistin and the antimycotic Fluconazole were the most frequent restricted antimicrobial drugs that required dose adjustment according to impaired renal function. The results of this research highlight the importance of the A-team in the optimization of restricted antimicrobial therapy. Non-adjusted doses of restricted antimicrobial drugs increase the possibility of adverse drug reactions and therefore jeopardize pharmacotherapy outcomes and patient safety.

Pharmacotherapy Problems in Best Possible Medication History of Hospital Admission in the Elderly.

Transfer of care is a sensitive process, especially for the elderly. Polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and renal risk drugs (RRDs) are important issues in the elderly. The aim of the study was to expand the use of the Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) and to evaluate polypharmacy, PIMs, DDIs, and inappropriately prescribed RRDs on hospital admission, as well as to determine their mutual relationship and association with patients' characteristics. An observational prospective study was conducted at the Internal Medicine Clinic of Clinical Hospital Dubrava. The study included 383 elderly patients. Overall, 49.9% of patients used 5−9 prescription medications and 31.8% used 10 or more medications. EU(7)-PIMs occurred in 80.7% (n = 309) of the participants. In total, 90.6% of participants had ≥1 potential DDI. In total, 43.6% of patients were found to have estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, of which 64.7% of patients had one or more inappropriately prescribed RRDs. The clinical pharmacist detected a high incidence of polypharmacy, PIMs, DDIs, and inappropriately prescribed RRDs on hospital admission. This study highlights the importance of early detection of pharmacotherapy problems by using the BPMH in order to prevent their circulation during a hospital stay. The positive correlations between polypharmacy, PIMs, DDIs, and inappropriately prescribed RRDs indicate that they are not independent, but rather occur simultaneously.

Impact of an integrated medication reconciliation model led by a hospital clinical pharmacist on the reduction of post-discharge unintentional discrepancies.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: There is no optimal standardized model in the transfer of care between hospitals and primary healthcare facilities. Transfer of care is a critical point during which unintentional discrepancies, that can jeopardize pharmacotherapy outcomes, can occur. The objective was to determine the effect that an integrated medication reconciliation model has on the reduction of the number of post-discharge unintentional discrepancies. METHODS: A randomized controlled study was conducted on an elderly patient population. The intervention group of patients received a medication reconciliation model, led entirely by a hospital clinical pharmacist (medication reconciliation at admission, review and optimization of pharmacotherapy during hospitalization, patient education and counselling, medication reconciliation at discharge, medication reconciliation as part of primary health care in collaboration with a primary care physician and a community pharmacist). Unintentional discrepancies were identified by comparing the medications listed on the discharge summary with the first list of medications prescribed and issued at primary care level, immediately after discharge. The main outcome measures were incidence, type and potential severity of post-discharge unintentional discrepancies. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 353 patients were analysed (182 in the intervention and 171 in the control group). The medication reconciliation model, led by a hospital clinical pharmacist, significantly reduced the number of patients with unintentional discrepancies by 57.1% (p < 0.001). The intervention reduced the number of patients with unintentional discrepancies associated with a potential moderate harm by 58.6% (p < 0.001) and those associated with a potential severe harm by 68.6% (p = 0.039). The most common discrepancies were incorrect dosage, drug omission and drug commission. Cardiovascular medications were most commonly involved in unintentional discrepancies. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The integrated medication reconciliation model, led by a hospital clinical pharmacist in collaboration with all health professionals involved in the patient's pharmacotherapy and treatment, significantly reduced unintentional discrepancies in the transfer of care.

Potentially inappropriate medications involved in drug-drug interactions at hospital discharge in Croatia.

Background The potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can significantly affect patient safety in the elderly, especially at transition of health care. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate PIMs involved in potentially clinically significant DDIs in prescribed pharmacotherapy of elderly patients at hospital discharge. Setting Internal Medicine Clinic of University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia. Method During a 16-month period, the pharmacotherapy data were assessed using Lexicomp Online screening software to identify category C (monitor drug therapy), D (consider therapy modification) and X (avoid combination) DDIs. The European Union (EU)(7)-PIM criteria were applied to detect inappropriately prescribed medications involved in DDIs. Clinical pharmacists obtained data from patients' medical records and patient/caregiver interviews. Main outcome measure The incidence of PIMs involved in potentially clinically significant DDIs. Results A total of 364 consecutive elderly patients were enrolled in the study. The mean number of prescription medications at discharge was 9.3. Overall, 2833 potentially clinically significant DDIs were identified: 2445 (86.3%) of them were category C, 347 (12.3%) category D and 41 (1.4%) were category X interactions. A total of 1164 PIMs were involved in 31.2% of category C interactions, 60.2% of category D interactions and 43.9% of category X interactions. The most frequent PIMs involved in potentially clinically significant DDIs were tramadol, benzodiazepines, moxonidine, vildagliptin and metoclopramide. Conclusion A very high incidence of DDIs in elderly patients and a high incidence of PIMs involved in DDIs was determined at hospital discharge.

Consumption of high-dose statins in patients older than 65 years in the Republic of Croatia in the period 2005 - 2015.

OBJECTIVE: Patients over 65 years of age on high-dose statins are most sensitive to the development of adverse effects of statins. The objective of this study is to analyze the consumption of high-dose statins in this patient group in Croatia in the period of 2005 - 2015. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the period of January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015, the Croatian Institute for Health Insurance provided us with the total number of: all insured, insured over 65 years of age, insured using statins, insured using high-dose statins, insured over 65 using statins, insured over 65 using high-dose statins, number of packages dispensed through all community pharmacies for all statins registered in Croatia divided by year and sex. Studied high-dose statins were: simvastatin 40 mg; atorvastatin 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg; fluvastatin 80 mg; rosuvastatin 40 mg. The yearly consumption of each form of statin was calculated in DDD/1,000 insured/day and was statistically processed. RESULTS: The consumption of all statins increased by 194%, while the consumption of high-dose statins in patients over 65 increased by 296%. The number of all patients on statin therapy increased by 58%, the number of patients over 65 on statin therapy increased by 87%, and the number of patients over 65 on high-dose statins increased by 326%. 60% of all patients over 65 receiving high-dose statins were women. The most used high-dose statins were atorvastatin and simvastatin. CONCLUSION: Consumption of all statins increased, mostly high-dose statins in the 65+ age group, the most sensitive population for adverse effects. The number of 65+ patients on high-dose statins grew much faster than the general statin user group, thus increasing the risk potential. Women are dominating all age and dose groups of statin users.

Potentially inappropriate medicines in elderly hospitalised patients according to the EU(7)-PIM list, STOPP version 2 criteria and comprehensive protocol.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) by using the EU(7)-PIM list, STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions) version 2 criteria and the new comprehensive protocol. METHODS: This prospective study involved a sample of 276 consecutive elderly patients discharged from the university teaching hospital. Age, gender, diagnoses, medication history and medicines at discharge were recorded. The main outcome measure was the prevalence of PIMs according to each set of criteria: EU(7)-PIM list, STOPP version 2 criteria and comprehensive protocol. RESULTS: The median patient age (range) was 74 (65-92) years. The median number of prescribed medications was 7 (1-17). STOPP identified 393 PIMs affecting 190 patients (69%), EU(7)-PIM list identified 330 PIMs in 184 patients (66.7%) whilst the comprehensive protocol identified 134 PIMs in 102 patients (37%). STOPP version 2 criteria identified significantly more PIMs per patient than the other two protocols (p < 0.001). Gender (p = 0.002), glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.039) and number of comorbidities (p = 0.001) were associated with the proportion of PIMs for the STOPP version 2 criteria only. CONCLUSION: A very high PIM prevalence at discharge was reported suggesting the urgent need for actions to reduce them. STOPP version 2 criteria identified significantly more PIMs than the EU(7)-PIM list and the comprehensive protocol and was found as a more sensitive tool for PIM detection.

Implementation of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Guidelines in Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Study in Two Croatian Hospitals.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of the 9th edition of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP9) guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolism in nonsurgical patients in clinical practice in one university and one general Croatian hospital. A retrospective study was conducted at Zadar General Hospital from Zadar and Dubrava University Hospital from Zagreb. Medical charts of all patients admitted to Medical Departments in two periods, before and after implementation of the ACCP9 guidelines, were analyzed. The ACCP9 guidelines were made available to all physicians through the hospital electronic information system immediately after the publication. The Hospital Drug Committees promoted implementation of the guidelines during their periodical clinical visits. Overall, 850 patients were included in the study in two periods. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of high-risk patients receiving thromboprophylaxis after the guidelines implementation in either hospital. In both periods, a signifi-cantly higher number of high-risk patients received thromboprophylaxis in Dubrava University Hos-pital in comparison with Zadar General Hospital (31.7% vs. 3.8% and 40.3% vs. 7.3%, respectively; p<0.001). This study revealed insufficient implementation of evidence-based thromboprophylaxis guidelines in clinical practice in two Croatian hospitals.

Clinical pharmacist-led program on medication reconciliation implementation at hospital admission: experience of a single university hospital in Croatia.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical pharmacist-led medication reconciliation process in clinical practice by quantifying and analyzing unintentional medication discrepancies at hospital admission. METHODS: An observational prospective study was conducted at the Clinical Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Dubrava, during a 1-year period (October 2014 - September 2015) as a part of the implementation of Safe Clinical Practice, Medication Reconciliation of the European Network for Patient Safety and Quality of Care Joint Action (PASQ JA) project. Patients older than 18 years taking at least one regular prescription medication were eligible for inclusion. Discrepancies between pharmacists' Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) and physicians' admission orders were detected and communicated directly to the physicians to clarify whether the observed changes in therapy were intentional or unintentional. All discrepancies were discussed by an expert panel and classified according to their potential to cause harm. RESULTS: In 411 patients included in the study, 1200 medication discrepancies were identified, with 202 (16.8%) being unintentional. One or more unintentional medication discrepancy was found in 148 (35%) patients. The most frequent type of unintentional medication discrepancy was drug omission (63.9%) followed by an incorrect dose (24.2%). More than half (59.9%) of the identified unintentional medication discrepancies had the potential to cause moderate to severe discomfort or clinical deterioration in the patient. CONCLUSION: Around 60% of medication errors were assessed as having the potential to threaten the patient safety. Clinical pharmacist-led medication reconciliation was shown to be an important tool in detecting medication discrepancies and preventing adverse patient outcomes. This standardized medication reconciliation process may be widely applicable to other health care organizations and clinical settings.

Adverse drug reactions in elderly patients following discharge from an internal medicine clinic.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and type of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and identify risk factors for ADRs in elderly patients within 30 days following discharge from an internal medicine clinic. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at the Internal Medicine Clinic of University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia, between September 1(st) and November 30(th) 2012. Patients aged ≥ 65 years discharged from the clinic during the study period were eligible for inclusion in the study. The follow-up visit was scheduled ~ 30 days after discharge. During the visit, the patients were assessed for the occurrence of ADRs. Two independent physicians evaluated each possible ADR by using the Naranjo ADR probability scale. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predisposing factors for ADRs. RESULTS: There were 209 patients included in this study. A total of 72 ADRs were detected in 63 (30.1%) patients. The most frequent ADRs were bleeding disorders associated with warfarin therapy, followed by hypoglycemia associated with antidiabetics. Five (6.9%) ADRs, which resulted in hospital admission, were classified as serious. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated number of prescribed drugs ≥4 and prescription of furosemide and warfarin to be associated with increased risk of ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that ADRs are an important cause of morbidity in elderly patients after hospital discharge. Judicious prescription of drugs and careful and frequent monitoring of drug therapy are necessary to reduce the risk of ADRs.